The height and width of a (closed) keep case are fixed at 190mm (7.48 inches) and 135mm (5.315 inches), respectively. The thickness may vary to accommodate more discs ("multi" case) or to require less shelf space ("slim" or "thin" case). For a typical single-disc case it is 15mm.
A keep case, thus, approximates the Video Software Dealers Association recommendation that a single-disc DVD-Video package have the same height as a VHS tape (187 mm) and the same width as a CD jewel case (142 mm). These dimensions are similar to digest size magazines.
William Howard Case was born on April 19, 1868 in Marshalltown, Iowa. He lived in South Dakota and Oregon until venturing to the Klondike during the 1898 Gold Rush. He had claims in Atlin. Case had three children: Howard, Alice, and Madge. His daughter Madge married Hugh Wade (Secretary of the Territory of Alaska from 1959-1966). Case was a member of the Masons and a Shriner. He died July 16, 1920. His studio was taken over by E. C. Adams.
Butler was represented by Patrick McGuinness and Ann Finnell, two attorneys from the public defenders office. They supplied a photograph of Butler with bruises on his face, which they claimed was the result of the interrogation. The jury deliberated for less than an hour before finding Butler not guilty; one juror later cited the testimony about the interrogation as one of the key factors in their decision. State Attorney Shorstein and Jacksonville Sheriff Glover took the unusual steps of apologizing to Butler and re-opening the case of two unrelated suspects. However, Michael Glover denied the allegations against him, and Shorstein said there was no evidence that Butler had been physically abused during the interrogation.
The case was heard in the Court of Common Pleas by Warburton J, Daniel J, Foster J, Walmisley J and the Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke, with a decision finally reached in the winter of 1610. The college's lawyers had argued that the two Acts of Parliament and the royal charter "intends, that none shall practise here but those who are most learned and expert, more than ordinary". As such, the college was free to punish for both practising without a licence and for malpractice, with the 1553 Act giving them the authority to imprison those they judged. Bonham's lawyers replied by arguing that the Acts and charter were intended to prevent malpractice, not practising without a licence.
Because of that and four other reasons given by Coke, the college was to stop trying to supervise medical practice, arbitrating and acting as a court. In support of his judgment, Coke cited not only Tregor's Case but also two anonymous cases with the academic names of Cessavit 42 and Annuitie 11, respectively.
For the next six months, Vrublevsky was in the Lefortovo detention center. After being released from custody, Vrublevsky was preparing to sell ChronoPay, the buyer was supposed to be a large state bank. Vrublevsky's lawyer argued that the case was completely fabricated, and demanded that the FSB officers be held accountable. The criminal case was sent for further investigation by a curious circumstance - the investigation of the FSB confused (and the Prosecutor General's Office confirmed this in the indictment) the number of the federal law on which Vrublevsky was involved: instead of 26-FZ (articles 272 illegal access and 273 creation and use of viruses) FZ, the law on ratification of the agreement of the Russian Federation and the countries of Asia on creation of the joint drug center. Subsequently, the prosecution in 273 articles was withdrawn by the Tushinsky District Court in view of the expired statute of limitations.
It is a question of present-day research, why is it that with pronouns in English, Case marking is preserved? A proposed answer has been that since pronouns are a closed category and don't partake in productive morphology, then they are in a way 'memorized' by speakers of English. The fact that they may be just memorized forms suggests that there is no significant reason for why members of this category should undergo a drastic change, losing morphologically overt Case marking. Considering this argument, why then do noun phrases receive genitive Case marking in English? The notion of abstract Case marking on all noun phrases can help answer this question: All noun phrases undergo Case marking assignment but this is not always phonetically realized at surface structure (the exception to surfacing of this morphological case is the possessive form -'s).
On July 31, 2013, a court session was held on the case of a DDoS attack on the Assist system site, during which Pavel Vrublevsky was recognized by the court as an organizer for an attack on Assist "with the aim of destroying it" and sentenced to 2.5 years in a general regime colony. Igor and Dmitri Artimovich, who were also participating in the case as accomplices, were sentenced to 2,5 years of the colony of the general regime, and Maxim Permyakov received two years probatory sentence "for active repentance and assistance to the investigation".
However, before the verdict, Mabel contested Richard’s claim to the land. She asserted in a secular court that ‘a daughter's claim to her father's inheritance must be preferred to that of a nephew.’ As the question of William’s marriage to both Albereda and Adelicia became the fundamental crux of the case the legal proceedings were moved to an ecclesiastical court as ‘[j]urisdiction over marriage was exercised by the church courts’.
In English, the object of a noun phrase is assigned Case by the closest c-commanding V (verb) or P (preposition) head which is usually the verb or preposition that selects it as a complement. Similarly the subject of a noun phrase is assigned Case from the finite tense head, T. The subject of a finite clause in English is nominative. As seen in English with sentences in passive form, the finite T is the head that assigns the nominative Case to the noun phrase (subject position); the closest noun phrase that T (tense head) c-commands is attracted to the empty specifier position of the tense phrase. This movement is a local specifier-to-specifier movement, satisfying Case requirements at the deep-structure level. Any sentence in English that surfaces with a noun phrase not containing Case, is a violation of the Case Filter and thus is said to 'crash' (determined to be ungrammatical).
The plaintiff must make a genuine effort to inform the defendant of the case through service of process, by which the plaintiff delivers to the defendant the same documents that the plaintiff filed with the court.
Examples of two case and three case systems within the case hierarchy
Following the death of William de Sackville, Richard launched a legal case against Mabel for the recovery of the lands of William de Sackville. Richard ‘claimed to be the heir of his uncle, William de Sackville, on the grounds that William’s only child, Mabel de Francheville, was illegitimate.' William de Sackville had married Albereda de Tresgoz, with both parties consenting to the marriage, before he married Mabel’s mother Adelicia (the daughter of Amfrid – the sheriff). However, Mabel did contest Richards claim asserting in a secular court that ‘a daughter's claim to her father's inheritance must be preferred to that of a nephew.’ Eventually Mabel, as the product of her father’s second marriage to Adelicia, was declared illegitimate by a ruling in the name of Pope Alexander III.
Example: English Noun Phrase Marked with Genitive Case : [ NP [ NP The boy] -'s poss ball]
Prominent after-market case manufacturers include Antec, BitFenix, Cooler Master, Corsair, Fractal Design, In Win Development, Lian Li, NZXT Corp., Phanteks, Rosewill, and Thermaltake, (DIY PC)
There is a phenomenon in English known as Exceptional case-marking (ECM). The phenomenon of ECM makes it evident that accusative case is not necessarily assigned to the complement of the assigner. The following example is intended to demonstrate that case can be assigned as long as there is no barrier that intervenes, and given that there is no nominal closer in proximity to the assigner than the assignee. For example (* indicates an ungrammaticality):
Case materials are any materials that are used to inform the decisions made by students in the course of a decision-forcing case. Commonly used case materials include articles that were composed for the explicit purpose of informing case discussion, secondary works initially produced for other purposes, historical documents, artifacts, video programs, and audio programs.
Germany then modified its complaint in the case before the ICJ, alleging furthermore that the U.S. violated international law by failing to implement the provisional measures. In opposition to the German submissions, the United States argued that the Vienna Convention did not grant rights to individuals, only to states; that the convention was meant to be exercised subject to the laws of each state party, which in the case of the United States meant subject to the doctrine of procedural default; and that Germany was seeking to turn the ICJ into an international court of criminal appeal.
In addition to preparing teams for national and international case competitions, Case Solvers also organizes its own competitions.